home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cs.utk.edu!not-for-mail
- From: charlton@cs.utk.edu (Ron Charlton)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: 16bit vs. 32bit
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 10:12:49 -0400
- Organization: CS Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Message-ID: <4ktlh1INNbb9@duncan.cs.utk.edu>
- References: <315C1210.5621@oc.com> <DpAvC8.HD4@eskimo.com> <4kk16j$9jt@newsie.dmc.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: duncan.cs.utk.edu
-
- In article <4kk16j$9jt@newsie.dmc.com> prozac@cape.com (gregg jennings) writes:
-
- >>>>> One of the whole points of using a high-level language is to
- >>>>> insulate you from low-level machine implementation details such
- >>>>> as the sizes of things in bits. If you find yourself needing to
- >>>>> know the sizes of things in bits, someone screwed up.
- >
- >>> And, how did that programmer "screw up" ?
- >
- >>By choosing a binary data file format, and condemning later
- >>programmers to use machine-dependent code if they wished to read
- >>it efficiently.
- >
- >Choosing a data format as you indicate implies pre-cognition:
- >
- > 1. You knew that a higher-bit system was going to appear in
- > the future (we all think that now, but many years ago?).
-
- Mistakes in computer design are made at least four times:
-
- by supercomputer designers;
- by mainframe designers;
- by minicomputer designers (okay, maybe this class no longer exists);
- and by microcomputer designers.
-
- You really don't need pre-cognition. Just look at what has gone before.
-
- Ron
- --
- A just machine to make big decisions | Ron Charlton
- Programmed by fellows with compassion and vision | charlton@cs.utk.edu
- We'll be clean when their work is done ----------------------
- We'll be eternally free yes and eternally young -- Donald Fagen, I.G.Y.
-